In Re McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., Dba the Sacramento Bee. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., Dba the Sacramento Bee v. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Mark Leslie Nathanson United States of America an Unnamed Public Official an Unidentified Private Citizen, Real Parties in Interest. United States of America v. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., Dba the Sacramento Bee v. Mark Leslie Nathanson

Good Law
288 F.3d 369·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3296·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7000
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 200201-70941California2,701 words

Opinion

Opinion

288 F.3d 369 In re McCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS, INC., dba The Sacramento Bee. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., dba The Sacramento Bee, Petitioner, v. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Respondent, Mark Leslie Nathanson; United States of America; An Unnamed Public Official; An Unidentified Private Citizen, Real Parties in Interest. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., dba The Sacramento Bee, Defendant-Appellee, v. Mark Leslie Nathanson, Appellant. No. 01-70941. No. 01-10335. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 13, 2001. Filed December 3, 2001. Amended April 17, 2002. Rex Heinke, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. James C. Harrison, San Leandro, CA, for the Unnamed Government Official. Doe Counsel, for the Unidentified Private Citizen. Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, NOONAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The opinion filed on December 3, 2001 is amended as follows: 2 At slip op. p. 16333, after new ¶ 3 and before ¶ 4, add the following: 3 The right "to inspect and copy judicial records is not absolute. Every court has supervisory power over its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.