Daniel v. County of Santa Barbara

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 4304·288 F.3d 375·2002 WL 663806·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3395·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7185
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 200299-56887California4,515 words

Opinion

Opinion

288 F.3d 375 Ann DANIEL; Leonard Hill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA; All Persons Unknown, Claiming any Right, Title Estate Lien or Interest in or to the w/in Described Property; Does, 1-1000 inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-56887. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 4, 2001. Filed March 12, 2002. Withdrawn April 18, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Steven A. Amerikaner, Hatch & Parent, Santa Barbara, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Stephen Shane Stark, Alan L. Seltzer and William M. Dillon, County of Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Peter H. Kaufman, Attorney General's Office, San Diego, CA, for Amicus California Coastal Commission. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV 98-09453-MMM. Before TROTT, McKEOWN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The Opinion filed March 12, 2002, and appearing in the advance sheets at 282 F.3d 1196 , is hereby withdrawn and replaced by the attached opinion. 2 With the filing of this new opinion, the panel has voted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.