Gerald Charles Souch v. Don Schaivo, Deputy Warden

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 4669·289 F.3d 616·2002 WL 766061·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3694·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7865
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 200201-15487California2,884 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

We must decide whether a state trial court violated the Ex Post Facto Clause by determining that the sentences on multiple counts of conviction would run consecutively, rather than concurrently, under a state statute not yet in effect when the underlying crimes were committed.

I

This case arises out of habeas petitioner Gerald Souch’s conviction in Arizona state court stemming from his activities of June 11, 1986. On that evening, clad in a frilly white dress and nylons, and wearing a white lacy bandana around his head, Souch broke into the house of Susan Gregor. Once inside, he woke Gregor, put his hand over her mouth, and held a knife to her neck. Souch then stripped her, forced her to submit to oral sex, forced her to perform oral sex on him, and finally, had intercourse with her. Afterward, he tied her up with an electrical cord, put a pillowcase over her head, and left the house.

An Arizona grand jury indicted Souch in connection with these events. On the first day of his ensuing trial before the Arizona Superior Court for Maricopa County, Souch entered an Alford plea to one count of armed burglary, three counts of sexual assault, and one count of aggravated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.