David Orsay v. United States Department Of Justice

Caution
2002 Daily Journal DAR 5249·289 F.3d 1125·18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1161·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4114·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9127
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 200200-16860California6,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

289 F.3d 1125 David ORSAY, Deputy U.S. Marshal; Michael Smith, Deputy U.S. Marshal, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; United States Marshals Service; Office of the Inspector General; Eduardo Gonzalez; G. Ray Havens; Deborah Westbrook; Richard E. Kelly; Jerry Enomoto; Michael Nelson; Carolyn Griffin, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-16860. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 6, 2001. Filed May 14, 2002. Gary W. Gorski, Fair Oaks, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Joanne P. Rodriguez, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Edward J. Lodge, * District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CIV-S-99-456-EJL. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge HUG; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge D.W. NELSON. HUG, Circuit Judge. 1 Deputy United States Marshals David Orsay and Michael Smith (collectively "Appellants") appeal the district court's dismissal of their claims under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. ("FTCA").…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.