Michael Sestich v. Long Beach Container Terminal Signal Mutual Indemnity Association Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 5524·289 F.3d 1157·2002 WL 1009184·2002 A.M.C. 1338·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4327
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 200200-70978California1,595 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Michael Sestich appeals the Benefits Review Board’s (“Board”) decision affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) termination of disability benefits under § 908(c)(21) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 . The Act provides compensation payable “in respect of disability” which “results from an injury,” 33 U.S.C. § 903 (a), and provides benefits equal to two-thirds of the difference between an injured worker’s pre-injury “average weekly wages” and his post-injury “wage-earning capacity.” 33 U.S.C. § 908 (e)(21).

Sestich contends that he has lost “wage-earning capacity,” within the meaning of the Act, to the extent that he cannot earn what he would have been able to earn absent his injury, and that he should be awarded benefits equal to two-thirds of that loss. Thus, Sestich contends, his benefit amount should be equal to two-thirds of the difference between his current actual earnings and the amount he could be earning absent his injury.

The Board rejected Sestich’s contention. It held that his “wage-earning capacity” within the meaning of the Act is equal to his actual post-injury earnings, and that he is entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.