Reynaldo Angulo-Dominguez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 5556·290 F.3d 1147·2002 WL 1012972·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4359·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9553
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 200200-15767California2,460 words

Opinion

Opinion

Weiner, J.

I.

Reynaldo Angulo-Dominguez appeals the district court’s order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 . Angulo-Dominguez contends that his deportation order violated the Constitution and the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), because he was erroneously denied eligibility for relief under the Registry Statute (“Registry Statute”). INA § 249, 8 U.S.C. § 1259 . Following the parties’ initial briefing, we ordered additional briefing, in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 , 121 S.Ct. 2271 , 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001), directed to the question whether Angulo-Dominguez qualified for a discretionary waiver of deportation under the prevailing interpretation of INA § 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c), at the time of his 1990 conviction. We affirm the district court’s conclusion that Angulo-Dominguez is not eligible for relief under the Registry Statute. We remand the balance of this case to the district court to consider in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 , 121 S.Ct. 2271 , 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001).

II.

Angulo-Dominguez is a native and citizen of Mexico. He entered the United States at Nogales, Arizona with his parents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.