United States v. Allen Ray Jordan

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 5978·291 F.3d 1091·2002 WL 1067325·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4644·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10187
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 200200-10233California4,247 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

Allen Ray Jordan was convicted by a jury on three counts of offenses involving the illegal manufacture of methamphetamine. Jordan appeals, arguing that the district court erred when it: (1) imposed life sentences on two counts in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 485 (2000); (2) enhanced his sentence under U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(a) for his leadership role in the offense; (3) denied his motion to suppress; and (4) rejected his motion to reopen the motion to suppress.

We hold that Jordan’s life sentence was imposed in violation of Apprendi We also hold that the leadership role enhancement was clearly erroneous. We affirm denial of Jordan’s motions seeking to suppress key evidence. We affirm Jordan’s conviction, vacate Jordan’s sentence, and remand to the district court for resentencing.

I.

This tale of criminal mischief begins in August 1996, when Paula Bolton, a confidential informant seeking the government’s favor in another criminal case, gave information to California law enforcement about a methamphetamine laboratory located on a rural property leased to Jordan. Soon thereafter, a search warrant was issued for Jordan’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.