Hugo Armendariz-Montoya v. Roseanne C. Sonchik, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 5975·291 F.3d 1116·2002 WL 1067331·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4631·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10189
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 200201-16029California2,798 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

We must decide whether deportation proceedings commence with the service of an order to show cause upon the alien or with the filing of such an order with the Immigration Court.

I

In 1972, Hugo Armendariz-Montoya (“Armendariz”) entered the United States without inspection from Mexico when he was three years old. In 1978, he adjusted his status to that of a lawful permanent resident. He has resided in the United States since his entry.

In 1994, the state of Arizona indicted Armendariz for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute. Armendariz pleaded not guilty, electing a jury trial. In September 1995, he was convicted and sentenced to five years, eight months imprisonment. His subsequent appeals were unsuccessful.

On September 22, 1995, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) lodged a detainer on Armendariz with the Arizona Department of Corrections. On April 5, 1996, the INS issued an order to show cause (“OSC”), charging Armendariz as deportable for having committed a qualifying controlled substance offense and an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(2)(A)(iii), (B)(i) (1994) (current version at 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(A)(iii), (B)(i)). On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.