Okanogan School District # 105 v. Superintendent Of Public Instruction For The State Of Washington

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 6138·291 F.3d 1161·115 A.L.R. 5th 825·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4790·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10608
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 200200-36096California4,606 words

Opinion

Opinion

291 F.3d 1161 OKANOGAN SCHOOL DISTRICT # 105; Omak School District # 19; Republic School District # 309; Oroville School District # 410; Tonasket School District # 404; Quillayute Valley School District # 402; Nespelem School District # 14; Stephen Kunkel; Marile Kunkel, individually and as guardians of Karen Kunkel, William Kunkel, Frank Kunkel, and Benjamin Kunkel; Methow Valley School District # 350, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Cusick School District # 59; Wenatchee School District # 246; Newport School District # 56; White Salmon Valley School District # 405; Cascade School District # 228; North Beach School District # 64; Kettle Falls School District # 212; Entiat School District # 127; Hoquiam School District # 28; Sedro Woolley School District # 101; Okanogan County, a Washington municipal corporation, Plaintiffs, v. SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; Treasurer for the State of Washington, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-36096. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 9, 2002. Filed June 3, 2002. Jeffrey L. Fisher, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. David A. Stolier, Assistant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.