Newdow v. Us Congress

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 7229·292 F.3d 597·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5700·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12576
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 200200-16423California9,837 words

Opinion

Opinion

292 F.3d 597 Michael A. NEWDOW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. US CONGRESS; United States of America; William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States; State Of California; Elk Grove Unified School District; David W. Gordon, Superintendent EGUSD; Sacramento City Unified School District; Jim Sweeney, Superintendent SCUSD, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-16423. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 14, 2002. June 26, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Michael Newdow, Pro Se, Sacramento, California, the plaintiff-appellant. Kristin S. Door, Assistant United States Attorney, Sacramento, California, Lowell V. Sturgill, Jr., Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for federal government defendants-appellees; A. Irving Scott, Terence J. Cassidy, Porter, Scott, Weiberg & Delehant, Sacramento, California, for school district defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Edward J. Schwartz, Senior Judge, Presiding D.C. No. CV-00-00495-MLS/PAN. Before: Alfred T. GOODWIN, Stephen REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ. OPINION GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.