Anna Rubin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 5873·292 F.3d 639·2002 WL 1059547·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4554·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9973
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 200298-16961California553 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

This appeal involves a question of Nevada state law upon which there was no clear precedent, and which was an essential determinant of this appeal. We certified two questions to the Nevada Supreme Court, which accepted the certification and rendered its decision.

Background

The background of the case is set forth in the order of certification ( 222 F.3d 750 ), which we repeat here for clarity of this opinion.

On February 15, • 1994, appellant Anna Marie Rubin was injured in an automobile accident while picking up supplies for her business. Because the accident occurred in the course of Rubin’s employment, Rubin submitted her medical bills to Nevada’s State Industrial Insurance System (“SIIS”). SIIS paid her medical expenses and some lost wages and other costs, but informed Rubin that she was required to reimburse SIIS if she recovered any damages from the other parties involved in the accident. Rubin sued the other parties involved in her accident and eventually reached a compromise settlement with both defendants. Rubin states that she subsequently reimbursed SIIS for 80% of the medical expenses it paid and that she is in negotiation with SIIS regarding the other 20%…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.