William Harold Mancuso, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Ana M. Olivarez, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
Opinion
Opinion
Tallman, J.
ORDER
The opinion filed March 6, 2002, reported : at 282 F.3d 728 (9th Cir.2002), is amended as follows: at .page 737, delete the paragraph that begins “On habeas review, ...” and insert the following language:
On habeas review, Mancuso is entitled to habeas relief only if it can be estab lished that the alleged trial error had a substantial and injurious effect, or influence on the jury’s verdict. See Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 637 , 113 S.Ct. 1710 , 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993); O’Neal v. McAninch, 513 U.S. 432, 436 , 115 S.Ct. 992 , 130 L.Ed.2d 947 (1995); Thompson v. Borg, 74 F.3d 1571, 1575 (9th Cir.1996). In determining whether the error had a substantial and injurious effect, the Supreme Court has long held that:
Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946). See also Jeffries v. Blodgett, 5 F.3d 1180, 1190 (9th Cir.1993) (same).
Page 738, replace “See Rodriguez v. Marshall, 125 F.3d 739, 744 (9th Cir.1997)” with “See Rodriguez, 125 F.3d at 744 .”
Page 738, replace “See Thompson v. Borg, 74 F.3d 1571, 1574 (9th Cir.1996)” with “See Thompson, 74 F.3d at 1574”.