Hernandez v. Hughes Missile Systems Company

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 6518·292 F.3d 1038·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5126·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 11042
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 200201-15512California3,365 words

Opinion

Opinion

292 F.3d 1038 Joel HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUGHES MISSILE SYSTEMS COMPANY, an Arizona corporation; Hughes Aircraft Company, a Delaware corporation; Raytheon Company, a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-15512. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 14, 2002. Filed June 11, 2002. Richard M. Martinez, Tucson, AZ, for plaintiff-appellant. Ronald J. Stolkin, Janice Procter-Murphy, and Barney M. Holtzman, Fennemore Craig, P.C., Tucson, AZ, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; John M. Roll, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-98-00319-JMR. Before REINHARDT, MAGILL * and FISHER, Circuit Judges. OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. 1 In July 1991, Plaintiff Joel Hernandez was given a drug test at his place of employment and tested positive for cocaine. He had worked for the Defendant, Hughes Missile Systems Company ("Hughes") 1 for approximately twenty-five years, first as a janitor, and at the time of his positive drug test, as a Calibration Service Technician. Hughes was also aware at this time that Hernandez struggled with an alcohol problem. Rather than being…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.