Giovanni Molina-Estrada v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 6507·293 F.3d 1089·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 11162
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 200299-70216California2,404 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed February 13, 2002, is amended as'follows:

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Graber and Paez have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Sneed has so recommended.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.

The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

OPINION

Petitioner Giovanni Molina-Estrada asks us to decide whether the fact that he was 18 years old when he arrived in the United States in 1983 constitutes an “extraordinary circumstance” excusing his failure to file an application for asylum by the statutory deadline of April 1, 1998. We lack jurisdiction to decide that question. We also conclude that the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) correctly held that Petitioner was ineligible for cancellation of removal and conclude that substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision regarding the withholding of removal. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition in part and deny it in part.

BACKGROUND

Petitioner Giovanni Molina-Estrada and his mother, who were citizens…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.