Pool v. Vanrheen

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 8205·297 F.3d 899·89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 793·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6505·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14671
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 200200-35997California5,234 words

Opinion

Opinion

297 F.3d 899 Vera POOL, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. Doug VANRHEEN; Darcy Bjork Don Dinwiddie, Defendants-Appellees, Multnomah County; Dan Noelle, Defendants-counter-claimants-Appellees. No. 00-35997. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 10, 2002. Filed July 22, 2002. 1 COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Jacqueline L. Koch, Koch & Deering, Portland, OR, for the plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellant. 2 Jeffrey M. Batchelor, Markowitz, Herbold, Glade & Mehlhaf, Portland, OR, for the defendants-counter-claimants-appellees. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Garr M. King, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-00597-AS. 4 Before: LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and RHOADES, * Senior District Judge. 5 RHOADES, Senior District Judge. 6 Vera Pool appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on: (1) her fourth claim for relief against all remaining Defendants 1 for retaliation against Pool's exercise of her constitutionally protected right to free speech under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ; and (2) her eleventh claim for relief against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.