Prescott v. County of El Dorado

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 8682·298 F.3d 844·170 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2667·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6900·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15408
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 200201-15913California1,239 words

Opinion

Opinion

298 F.3d 844 Steven PRESCOTT; Robert F. Berry; Cheryl L. Jones; Karen Pierce; Christine M. Turney, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF EL DORADO; Kathy Libicki; Local 1 El Dorado County Employees Association, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-15913. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 9, 2002. Filed August 1, 2002. Fred J. Hiestand, Sacramento, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Stacey Leyton, Altshuler, Berzon, Nussbaum, Rubin & Demain, San Francisco, CA, for the amicus. W. James Young, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc., Springfield, VA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence K. Karlton, Chief Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-95-01859-LKK. Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, B. FLETCHER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. OPINION SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. 1 This case was before us previously, when we held, inter alia, that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge an indemnification provision in a collective bargaining agreement. Prescott v. County of El Dorado, 177 F.3d 1102, 1112 (9th Cir.1999) ( Prescott I ). That provision requires the union to hold…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.