Jose Manuel Celis-Castellano v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Bad Law
298 F.3d 888·2002 WL 1783980·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7010·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15545
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 200200-71274California2,004 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

Celis-Castellano petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board), in which the Board dismissed his appeal from an order by an immigration judge (IJ) denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings after he was ordered in absentia removed to Guatemala. The Board had jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1103 and 8 C.F.R. §§ 3.1 (b)(3), 3.23(b)(1) and 240.15. We have jurisdiction over this timely-filed petition pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition.

I.

Petitioner Celis-Castellano is a native and citizen of Guatemala. He was admitted to the United States about January 1, 1983, as a non-immigrant alien with authorization to remain for a temporary period, not past March 1, 1983, but he did not leave. In a Notice to Appear dated May 21, 1998, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) charged that Celis-Cas-tellano was subject to removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(1)(B), because after admission to the United States as a non-immigrant under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(15), he remained for a time longer than permitted.

Celis-Castellano was ordered to appear before an IJ for removal proceedings on June 24, 1998, at 1:30 p.m.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.