In Re James F. George, Iii, in Re Margie R. George, Debtors, James F. George, III Margie R. George v. City of Morro Bay, David W. Howell Rick Algert David R. Hunt William Yates Ahnawake Unger Colby Crotzer Ben Luna Cathy Novak Wilhelm Hoppe Tina Hoppe C. Randall Cook

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 9405·298 F.3d 1160·39 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 277·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7434·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16474
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 200201-56445California1,897 words

Opinion

Opinion

298 F.3d 1160 In re James F. GEORGE, III, In re Margie R. George, Debtors, James F. George, III; Margie R. George, Appellants, v. City of Morro Bay, David W. Howell; Rick Algert; David R. Hunt; William Yates; Ahnawake Unger; Colby Crotzer; Ben Luna; Cathy Novak; Wilhelm Hoppe; Tina Hoppe; C. Randall Cook, Appellees. No. 01-56445. No. BAP-CC-00-01598-PMOBR. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 10, 2002. Filed August 15, 2002. Shane Kramer, San Luis Obispo, California, for the appellants. David R. Hunt and Michael J. Boyajian, Hunt & Associates, San Luis Obispo, California, for the appellees. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Perris, Montali and Brown, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding. Before HUG, FARRIS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. OPINION PER CURIAM. 1 Debtors James and Margie George contend that the bankruptcy court did not have jurisdiction to dismiss their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 takings claim, and that the dismissal was incorrect as a matter of law. The defendants, the City of Morro Bay and numerous city officials, move for attorneys' fees and double costs for defending a frivolous appeal. We affirm the Bankruptcy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.