Elsayed Mukhtar v. California State University, Hayward

Caution
2002 Daily Journal DAR 8953·299 F.3d 1053·59 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 588·83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,257·89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 849
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 7, 200201-15565California7,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

299 F.3d 1053 Mohamed Osman ELSAYED MUKHTAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD, a public entity, Carlos Navarro and Norma Rees, employees of the California State University in their Official and Individual Capacities, Defendants-Appellants. No. 01-15565. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 2002. Filed August 7, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Felicia R. Reid, Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kraemer & Sloan, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued the cause for the defendants-appellants. Fania E. Davis, Oakland, CA, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellee; Darryl Parker, Seattle, Washington, was on the brief. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Claudia Wilken, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-97-02566-CW. Before O'SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge. * OPINION O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge. 1 We must decide whether the district court fulfilled its obligation to ensure that the testimony of an expert witness was sufficiently reliable before it was presented to the jury. 2 * California State University, Hayward…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.