King County v. John Rasmussen

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 9108·299 F.3d 1077·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7242·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16044
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 9, 200201-35610California6,774 words

Opinion

Opinion

299 F.3d 1077 KING COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. John RASMUSSEN; Nancy Rasmussen, husband and wife, and their marital community, Defendants-counter-claimants-Appellants. No. 01-35610. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 13, 2002. Filed August 9, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED J. Jarrette Sandlin, Sandlin Law Firm, Zillah, WA, for the defendants-counter-plaintiffs-appellants. Howard P. Schneiderman and Scott Johnson, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; Barbara J. Rothstein, Chief District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-01637-BJR. Before B. FLETCHER and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and MURGUIA, District Judge. 1 OPINION BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. 1 This case arises from a dispute over a 100-foot-wide strip of land running along a portion of the eastern shore of Lake Sammamish in King County, Washington, that was formerly used as part of a railway corridor. King County filed suit against the Rasmussens to quiet title over…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.