Astrid E.A. Omohundro, Individually and as the Beneficiary of the Estate of Stuart W. Omohundro v. United States

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 9501·300 F.3d 1065·2002 WL 1891700·90 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5860·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16628
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 200200-56558California1,724 words

Opinion

Opinion

Appellant Astrid Omohundro (“Omohun-dro”) appeals an order of the district court dismissing her complaint seeking credit for the overpayment of her 1993 income taxes. Relying on our decision in Miller v. United States, 38 F.3d 473 (9th Cir.1994), the district court held it lacked jurisdiction because Omohundro failed to file a timely administrative claim for credit with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). We reverse.

I.

To bring an action for credit or refund of overpaid taxes, a taxpayer must first file an administrative claim with the IRS. See I.R.C. § 7422(a) (2002). The administrative claim must be filed:

I.R.C. § 6511(a) (2002). A taxpayer's failure to file an administrative claim within the time periods imposed by statute divests the district court of jurisdiction over an action for a refund or credit. See United States v. Dalm, 494 U.S. 596, 602 , 110 S.Ct. 1361 , 108 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990).

The issue in this case is whether a taxpayer’s claim for credit or refund of overpaid taxes is timely under I.R.C. § 6511(a) if the claim is filed within three years of the date the taxpayer filed his return, regardless of whether the return was filed on or before the date it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.