United States v. James M. Culliton

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 9662·300 F.3d 1139·2002 WL 1930006·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7655·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17347
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 200200-10599California2,223 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hawkins, J.

Culliton appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for making false statements on a medical form submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”). He argues the form is fundamentally ambiguous and therefore the district court should have dismissed the indictment. Joining the only other circuit to address the issue, we conclude that the challenged questions on the FAA form are sufficiently confusing, vague and overbroad as to invite selective prosecution. Consequently, we reverse Culliton’s conviction.

BACKGROUND

James Culliton is an aviation lawyer and pilot. In August 1995, he reclined in a chair that broke and tipped over, which caused him to hit his head on a credenza nearby. Following the accident, Culliton was treated for vision problems, dizziness, headaches, memory loss and depression. As a result of his injuries, Culliton brought a private civil action against three defendants, eventually reaching a settlement with two of them. The third, Viking Office Products, asserted a defense of insurance fraud and refused to settle. Apparently dissatisfied with available civil relief, Viking decided to seek criminal sanctions, transferring Culliton’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.