Mendoza v. Zirkle Fruit Co.

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 10079·301 F.3d 1163·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8040·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18044
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 200201-35276California5,408 words

Opinion

Opinion

301 F.3d 1163 Olivia MENDOZA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Juana Mendiola, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ZIRKLE FRUIT CO., a Washington corporation; Matson Fruit Company, a Washington corporation; Selective Employment Agency, Inc., a Washington corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-35276. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 7, 2002. Filed September 3, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Steve W. Berman & Andrew M. Volk, Hagens Berman LLP, Seattle, WA, and Howard W. Foster, Johnson & Bell, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for the appellants. Irwin Schwartz, Law Offices of Irwin Schwartz, Seattle, WA, Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Law Offices of Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Seattle, WA, Walter G. Meyer, Meyer, Fluegge & Tenney, P.S., Yakima, WA, Terry Schmalz, Halverson & Applegate, P.S., Yakima, WA, for appellees Zirkle Fruit Co. and Matson Fruit Co. J. Jay Carroll, Brendan Victor Monahan, Velikanje, Moore & Shore, P.S., Yakima, WA, for appellee Selective Employment Agency, Inc. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.