Zambrano v. Immigration And Naturalization Service

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 10131·302 F.3d 909·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8077·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18180
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 200200-16191California338 words

Opinion

Opinion

302 F.3d 909 Marta ZAMBRANO; Margarita Rodriguez; Graciela Lopez; Andrea Ruiz; Martha Ozuna; Jorge Perdoma, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Edwin Meese; Alan Nelson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-16191. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 7, 2001. Filed March 7, 2002. Amended September 4, 2002. Richard M. Pearl, Berkeley, CA, for the appellants. William J. Howard and Antony W. Norwood, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-88-00455-EJG. Before; HUG, D.W. NELSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 The Opinion filed March 7, 2002 is amended as follows: on slip opinion page 3832, last paragraph (that carries over to page 3833) [282 F.3d at 1152], change the paragraph to read: 2 The overall scheme of the new legislation reflects that by specifically making the repeal of § 377 retroactive to the date of the enactment of the IRCA, the statutory language was intended to remove a jurisdictional obstacle to litigation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.