Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton, & Scripps, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton, & Scripps

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 10089·303 F.3d 994·13 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 792·83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,168·89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1134
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 200201-55321California11,135 words

Opinion

Opinion

303 F.3d 994 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON, & SCRIPPS, Defendant-Appellant. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton, & Scripps, Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-57222. No. 01-55321. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 1, 2002. Filed September 3, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Charles A. Bird, Kelly Capen Douglas, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP, San Diego, CA, for the defendant-appellant-appellee. Robert F. Walker, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, Los Angeles, CA, defendant-appellant-appellee. Dori K. Bernstein, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, DC, for the plaintiff-appellee-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Florence Marie Cooper, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-01322-FMC. Before PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, District Judge. * OPINION TROTT, Circuit Judge. 1 The law firm Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP ("Luce Forward") refused to hire Donald Scott Lagatree ("Lagatree") as a full-time legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.