Arwen Bird v. Lewis & Clark College Thomas Darrow, Phd Larry A. Meyers, Arwen Bird v. Lewis & Clark College Thomas Darrow, Phd Larry A. Meyers

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 10084·303 F.3d 1015·2002 WL 2004435·13 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 930·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8030
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 200200-35912, 00-35944California3,546 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goodwin, J.

Arwen Bird (“Bird”) appeals the judgment in favor of Lewis & Clark College and a number of school administrators (collectively, “the College”). Bird alleges, among other claims, that the College discriminated against her on the basis of disability, in violation of the Rehabilitation Act (“Rehab Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq., and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm for the following reasons.

Background

A. Factual history

Bird was a student of the College when an automobile accident left her confined to a wheelchair. Upon learning of her injury, the College rebuilt parts of the campus to make it more wheelchair-accessible. It installed ramps at Bird’s dormitory, changed its inside doors, and remodeled the bathrooms. It also reconfigured the biology labs where she worked.

In the fall of 1994, Bird applied for, and was accepted in, the College’s Spring 1996 overseas program. The program was field-based and required participants to spend much of their time exploring the Australian continent. After accepting Bird into the program, the College approached Global Education…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.