United States v. James Dalton Bell

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 10831·303 F.3d 1187·2002 WL 31085604·90 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6450·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9648
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 200201-30303California2,408 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hawkins, J.

Defendanb-Appellant James Dalton Bell (“Bell”) appeals his jury trial conviction and ten-year sentence for interstate stalking and using the facilities of interstate commerce for interstate stalking in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2261A and 2261A (2)(B)(i), alleging error in the handling of his efforts to obtain substitute counsel, the giving of certain jury instructions and sentencing. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 1291 .

Facts & Procedural History

The proceedings at issue arise from Bell’s long and troubled history with the government and in particular the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)- Bell first came to the attention of authorities in 1996 in connection with his Internet posting of home addresses of IRS employees laced with veiled harassment threats and the activities of the Multnomah County Common Law Court (“MCCLC”), a group of citizens with grievances against government officials. At an MCCLC meeting in early 1997, Bell distributed an essay entitled “Assassination Politics” in which he proposed the development of a system to solicit the killing of government employees using encrypted Internet messages. Bell also posted the essay online.

Words turned to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.