Canatella v. State of California

Good Law
304 F.3d 843·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18468
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 200200-16782California5,987 words

Opinion

Opinion

304 F.3d 843 Richard A. CANATELLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; Board of Governors of the State Bar of California; President of the State Bar Association; the Judges of the State Bar Court; the Office of the Chief Counsel of the State Bar of California, Trial Counsel, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-16782. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 5, 2001. Filed June 12, 2002. Amended September 9, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Richard A. Canatella (argued), Cotter & Del Carlo, San Francisco, CA, plaintiff-appellant, Pro Se. Jay M. Goldman (argued), Dina E. Goldman (on the brief), Office of the General Counsel, The State Bar of California, and Tom Blake, Office of the Attorney General of the State of California, San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-01105-MJJ. Before HUG, D.W. NELSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The Opinion filed on June 12, 2002, and appearing at slip op. 8487 [ 293 F.3d 1099 ] is amended as follows: 2 At slip op. page 8499 [293 F.3d at 1105-06],…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.