United States v. Viken Hovsepian Viken Yacoubian, Viken Hovsepian v. United States of America United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Viken Hovsepian Viken Yacoubian v. United States of America United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 11380·307 F.3d 922·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10002·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20668
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 200299-56922California10,710 words

Opinion

Opinion

307 F.3d 922 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Viken HOVSEPIAN; Viken Yacoubian, Defendants-Appellees. Viken Hovsepian, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. United States of America; United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendants-Appellants. Viken Hovsepian; Viken Yacoubian, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. United States of America; United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendants-Appellants. No. 99-50041. No. 01-55247. No. 99-56922. No. 00-55320. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued February 6, 2001. Submission Deferred February 15, 2001. Reargued and Submitted December 11, 2001. Filed September 30, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Jean Rosenbluth, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause for the appellant. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, United States Attorney; John S. Gordon, United States Attorney; Ronald L. Cheng, Acting Assistant United States Attorney; Lawrence E. Kole, Assistant United States 15240 Attorney; Los Angeles, CA, were on the briefs for the appellant. Barrett S. Litt, Litt & Associates, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause for appellee Viken Hovsepian. Michael J.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.