Southern California Edison Company v. Loretta M. Lynch Henry M. Duque Richard A. Bilas Carl W. Wood Geoffrey F. Brown, Commissioners of California Public Utilities Commission, Utility Reform Network, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. Southern California Edison Company, Reliant Energy Services, Inc. Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, Lp, Intervenors-Appellants v. Loretta M. Lynch Henry M. Duque Richard A. Bilas Carl W. Wood Geoffrey F. Brown, Southern California Edison Company, California Manufacturers and Technology Assn., Intervenor-Appellant v. Loretta M. Lynch Henry M. Duque Richard A. Bilas Carl W. Wood Geoffrey F. Brown, in Their Official Capacities as Commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 11464·307 F.3d 943·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10052·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20840
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 200201-56879California279 words

Opinion

Opinion

307 F.3d 943 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Loretta M. LYNCH; Henry M. Duque; Richard A. Bilas; Carl W. Wood; Geoffrey F. Brown, Commissioners of California Public Utilities Commission, Defendants-Appellees, Utility Reform Network, Defendant-intervenor-Appellant. Southern California Edison Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, Reliant Energy Services, Inc.; Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, LP, Intervenors-Appellants, v. Loretta M. Lynch; Henry M. Duque; Richard A. Bilas; Carl W. Wood; Geoffrey F. Brown, Defendants. Southern California Edison Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, California Manufacturers and Technology Assn., Intervenor-Appellant, v. Loretta M. Lynch; Henry M. Duque; Richard A. Bilas; Carl W. Wood; Geoffrey F. Brown, in their official capacities as Commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-56879. No. 01-56993. No. 01-57020. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. September 30, 2002. ORDER THOMAS, Circuit Judge. 1 The parties and amici are directed to file four (4) copies of all briefs and two (2) copies of excerpts of record with the U.S. Court of Appeals, rather than the Supreme Court of California,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.