Berg v. Popham

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 11619·307 F.3d 1028·33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20083·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10158·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20857
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 200201-35807California1,931 words

Opinion

Opinion

307 F.3d 1028 David and Marge BERG, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David POPHAM and Tsukiko Popham, d/b/a Alladin Cleaners, Defendants, and The Norge Corporation, and its successors in interest Magic Chef Corporation, and Maytag Corporation, ABC Inc., ABC Co., ABC Corp., Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-35807. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Filed October 4, 2002. Michael W. Flanigan, Walther & Flanigan, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Christopher W. Angius, Portland, OR, Joseph R. Loescher, Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz, Powell & Brundin LLC, Anchorage, AK, I. Franklin Hunsaker, Bullivant Houser Bailey, Penderglass & Hoffman, Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees. ORDER CERTIFYING QUESTIONS TO THE ALASKA SUPREME COURT Before B. FLETCHER, ALARCON and GRABER, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 GRABER, Circuit Judge, Presiding. 2 Pursuant to Rule 407(a) of the Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure, we respectfully request that the Alaska Supreme Court answer the following novel questions of Alaska law: 3 1. Alaska Statute section 46.03.822(a)(4), in contrast to 42 U.S.C. § 9607 (a)(3), contains the word "or" preceding the phrase "by any other party or entity." In light…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.