United States v. Bernard Gross

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 11713·307 F.3d 1043·2002 WL 31236393·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10192·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20954
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 200201-50033California682 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schwarzer, J.

Bernard Gross appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion to modify the conditions of his supervised release. Two questions are presented: (1) whether a district court has the statutory authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (e) to modify conditions of a defendant’s supervised release based on a claim of illegality; and (2) whether a dis trict court has authority to modify supervised release conditions based on the parties’ stipulation. We hold that the answer to both questions is no.

Gross was convicted, after a jury trial, of three counts of bankruptcy fraud. 18 U.S.C. § 152 (3). His appeal from his conviction and sentence remains pending. The instant appeal is from the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of the terms of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 .

As a part of Gross’s sentence, the district court imposed conditions of supervised release which, inter alia, restricted Gross from doing the following without prior approval from the probation officer: transferring assets valued in excess of $100, acquiring an interest in real estate, and engaging in any business involving real…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.