John R. Ulrich, Jr., M.D. v. City and County of San Francisco Laguna Honda Hospital Maria v. Rivero, M.D. Theresa Berta, M.D. Melissa Welch, M.D.

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 11954·308 F.3d 968·2002 WL 31268881·19 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 477·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10349
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 11, 200201-15717California8,817 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

In 1998, after nearly 10 years of service at Laguna Honda Hospital (“hospital”) as a physician, John R. Ulrich, Jr., M.D., began protesting a decision by the San Francisco Department of Health to lay off a class of physicians at the hospital. He was not in the affected classification. Soon after, Dr. Ulrich received notice that he was being investigated by the hospital for professional incompetence. He subsequently resigned in protest over the layoffs, but, upon learning that his resignation might generate an adverse action report to state and federal authorities, attempted to rescind that resignation pending the outcome of the investigation of him. The hospital refused to accept his rescission of resignation and filed an adverse action report against him that leaves the impression that he resigned because he was guilty of the charges brought against him. Dr. Ulrich filed this action alleging retaliation based on speech protected by the First Amendment and denial of due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. We affirm in part and reverse in part, holding that (1) Dr. Ulrich did not have a property right in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.