United States v. Loyd Dean Stanley, AKA Dean Stanley

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 12404·309 F.3d 611·2002 WL 31415465·90 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7007·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10729
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 200201-50734California808 words

Opinion

Opinion

Silverman, J.

PacShip Repair and Fabrication Inc., the victim of a kickback scheme, suffered a loss of over $900,000. Because of an error at the time of defendant Loyd Stanley’s plea, his restitution liability was capped at $500,000. Stanley’s co-defendants paid over $300,000 in restitution, reducing PacShip’s loss to nearly $600,000. In this appeal, Stanley maintains that the co-defendants’ payments should have been deducted from his $500,000 restitution cap, thus reducing his restitution exposure to less than $200,000. We agree with the district court that the restitution paid by the co-defendants only reduced the victim’s loss; it did not reduce Stanley’s restitution ceiling. Because PacShip’s loss still exceeded $500,000 even after the co-defendants’s payments were credited, the district court did not err in ordering Stanley to pay restitution of $500,000.

I. Background

Stanley was an employee of PacShip, which had a contract with the Navy to perform repairs on aircraft carriers. Gamma Tech Industries, Inc. and Tidelands Testing, Inc., were two of PacShip’s subcontractors, and Michael Gallegos was a principal of Gamma Tech and Tidelands. Stanley, who was in charge of overseeing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.