Marjorie Cathey Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Good Law
310 F.3d 640·90 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7159·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11023·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23234
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 8, 200200-71285California2,407 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tashima, J.

Marjorie Cathey Miller appeals a decision of the United States Tax Court, granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Miller contends that the tax court erred in concluding that she was not entitled to an abatement of interest on employment taxes under 26 U.S.C. § 6404 (e). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

In 1984, 1985, and 1986, Miller operated a beauty salon in the State of Washington. Miller leased out individual spaces in the salon to individual beauticians and treated the lessees as independent contractors rather than employees for tax purposes. In 1987, the Commissioner conducted an examination of Miller’s business and concluded that the individuals should have been treated as employees rather than independent contractors. The Commissioner accordingly prepared Form 4666, Summary of Employment Tax Examination, and concluded that Miller owed $31,671.43 in employment taxes and penalties for the three tax years in question.

On December 12, 1988, Miller signed two Forms 2504, Agreement to Assessment and Collection of Additional Tax and Acceptance of Overassessment, consenting to the assessment and collection of $31,671.43 in taxes and penalties. Miller…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.