Patel v. City of San Bernardino

Good Law
310 F.3d 1134
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 200201-55280California2,520 words

Opinion

Opinion

310 F.3d 1134 Pravin D. PATEL; Aruna P. Patel; Sanjay Patel; Harivandan P. Patel; Hansa Patel; Amrut N. Patel; Sita Patel; Jayesh Patel; Suresh Patel; Mahesh Patel; Bhavabhai Patel; Vibhakar B. Patel; Mahendra Patel; Vimalaben V. Patel; Markan Thakar; Chandravadan K.P. Shastri; Pushpa C. Shastri; Vijay K. Shastri; Bhagwatiben V. Shastri; Rajendra Shastri; Anita Shastri, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 01-55280. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 4, 2002. Filed November 13, 2002. Frank A. Weiser, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. James F. Penman, City Attorney, and Robert L. Simmons, Sr., Assistant City Attorney, San Bernardino, CA, for the defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Robert J. Timlin, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-98-00298-RJT. Before: BROWNING, THOMAS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge. 1 Pravin D. Patel and twenty other named plaintiffs sued the city of San Bernardino, California for damages stemming from the city's enforcement of an unlawful tax.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.