Mauro Antonio Cano-Merida v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 13185·311 F.3d 960·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11325·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23936
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 200201-71423California2,091 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trott, J.

Mauro Antonio Cano-Merida (“Cano”) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) order affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his motion to reconsider. Cano argues he was denied a meaningful opportunity to present his asylum application. We agree. We grant Cano’s petition, in part, and remand to the BIA with instructions to order a new hearing before the immigration judge (“IJ”).

Cano also petitions for review of the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen to seek relief under the Convention Against Torture. Because the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying this motion, we deny this part of Cano’s petition.

BACKGROUND

Cano, a citizen of Guatemala, entered deportation proceedings on December 12, 1996. At his first hearing, Cano chose to proceed without an attorney and requested the IJ consider his asylum application in support of his claim. The IJ informed Cano of his “right to examine and object to any evidence that might be presented by the Government and to present evidence on [his] own behalf.” Cano attempted to submit documents in Spanish to support his application. The IJ told Cano to have the documents translated into English and to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.