Soliman v. Philip Morris Incorporated

Bad Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 13197·311 F.3d 966·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11328·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23948
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 200201-15387California4,592 words

Opinion

Opinion

311 F.3d 966 Maher W. SOLIMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED; Philip Morris Companies; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company; Council for Tobacco Research USA Inc.; Tobacco Institute, Inc.; Lorillard Tobacco Company; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.; B.A.T. Industries P.L.C.; American Tobacco Company; Liggett Group Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-15387. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted August 16, 2002. * Filed November 22, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Maher W. Soliman, San Francisco, CA, pro se. Alicia J. Donahue and Patrick J. Gregory of Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, San Francisco, CA, for appellees Philip Morris, Inc., and Philip Morris Companies, Inc. W. Bruce Wold and Shelley L. Brittman of Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, San Francisco, CA, for appellees Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to the American Tobacco Company. Mary C. Oppedahl of Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May P.C., Oakland, CA, for appellee Tobacco Institute, Inc. Steven H. Bergman and Mary Elizabeth McGarry of Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett, Los Angeles, CA, and New York, NY, for appellee B.A.T.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.