Aurelian Dobrota v. Iimmigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 13808·311 F.3d 1206·2002 WL 31730719·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11763·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24660
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 200201-71266California3,235 words

Opinion

Opinion

Berzon, J.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. INS No. A70-664-059.

Aurelian Dobrota petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his motion to reopen deportation proceedings after he was ordered deported in absentia pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c) (1995). He asserts that because neither he nor his attorney received notice of his deportation hearing, his deportation violated the statute and due process. We have jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1005a (1996), and grant Mr. Dobrota’s petition for review.

BACKGROUND

Aurelian Dobrota, a Romanian citizen, was admitted to the United States on or around January 5, 1993 as a “nonimmi-grant visitor for pleasure with authorization to remain in the United States for a temporary period not to exceed July 4, 1993.” Mr. Dobrota did not depart by July 4, 1993, however, but instead remained in the United States and filed an application for asylum. At some point during his asylum proceedings Mr. Dobro-ta hired attorney John Alcorn to represent him. In November 1993, Mr. Alcorn filed Form G-28 “Entry of Attorney” with the INS Asylum Office, stating that he now represented Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.