United States v. Alejandro Matus-Leva

Good Law
2002 Daily Journal DAR 13801·311 F.3d 1214·2002 WL 31730846·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11767·2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24659
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 200201-50093California2,195 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

Matus-Leva entered a conditional plea of guilty for two counts of bringing in illegal aliens resulting in death, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324 (a)(1)(A)(i) and (a)(l)(B)(iv), and one count of bringing in illegal aliens for financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(2)(B)(ii). He was sentenced to sixty-three months imprisonment. He argues that the district court erred in failing to suppress his incriminating statements; that the alien smuggling statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1324 , violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000); that the district court erred in not requiring the government to establish mens rea to support the “resulting in ... death” factor of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(l)(B)(iv), and, alternatively, that the “resulting in ... death” requirement is void for vagueness; that the district court erred in refusing to bifurcate the trial to separate the “resulting in ... death” evidence from the remainder of the case. Finally, Matus-Leva alleges several sentencing errors under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm the district court in all respects.

I

On March 4, 2000, eleven individuals,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.