S.M., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. J.K., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Good Law
315 F.3d 1058
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 200399-16184California244 words

Opinion

Opinion

315 F.3d 1058 S.M., * Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. J.K., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. No. 99-16184. No. 99-16960. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 14, 2001. Filed August 27, 2001. Amended January 14, 2003. Gary M. Levitt, David C. Schutter & Associates, Honolulu, HI, for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant. Richard E. Wilson, Simons & Ichinose, Honolulu, HI, for the plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant. Arthur B. Reinwald, Dennis E.W. O'Connor, Michael J. McGuigan, and Jason M. Tani, Reinwald, O'Connor & Marrack, Honolulu, HI, for the defendant-appellant-cross-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i; Francis I. Yamashita, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV 94-00181-FIY. Before: B. FLETCHER, CANBY, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. Prior report: 262 F.3d 914 ORDER 1 The Court sua sponte recalls the mandate issued on October 23, 2001. 2 The opinion filed August 27, 2001, is hereby amended by deleting the following sentence from footnote 7: "We decline to adopt the [ United States v. ] Scholl, [ 959 F.Supp. 1189 (D.Ariz.1997)] district court's reasoning now, as it is contrary to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.