Homedics, Inc. v. Valley Forge Insurance Company

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 293·315 F.3d 1135·65 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1365·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 215·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 269
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 9, 200300-55306California3,797 words

Opinion

Opinion

315 F.3d 1135 HOMEDICS, INC., a Michigan corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION; Transcontinental Insurance Company, a New York corporation; Continental Insurance Company, a New Hampshire corporation; CIGNA Property and Casualty Insurance Company, a Connecticut corporation; Ace Fire Underwriters Insurance Company (fka CIGNA Fire Underwriters Insurance Company), a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-55306. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted November 4, 2002. * Filed January 9, 2003. David A. Gauntlett, Gauntlett & Associates, Irvine, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Janelle F. Garchie, Correll, Garchie & Edwards, San Diego, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court or the Central District of California; David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-00928-DOC. Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, THOMPSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. OPINION CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge. 1 The question we address here is to what extent, under California law, patent infringement claims invoke an insurers' duty to defend under a commercial general…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.