Simo v. Union Of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 609·316 F.3d 974·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 497·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 591
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 200301-55937California10,899 words

Opinion

Opinion

316 F.3d 974 Tauni SIMO, Dalores Rowe, Maria Ramirez, Petra Villegas, Petra Deleon, Candy Fernandez, Gabriela Uribe, Angelina Perez, Maria Clark, Lourdes Gonzalez, Vilma Garcia, Dolores Olivas, Maria Osorio, Silvie Madrigal, Ana Gonzales, Maria Aguirre, Mariana Godina, Lidia Peraza, Chong Suk Kim, Claristine Hadley, Yong Hui Pak, Teresa Gomez, Noemi Maya, Teresa Wilson Sloan, Miyako Kanai, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNION OF NEEDLETRADES, INDUSTRIAL & TEXTILE EMPLOYEES, SOUTHWEST DISTRICT COUNCIL; Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees, AFL-CIO; Antonio Orea; Roxana Guevara, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-55937. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 2, 2002. Filed January 16, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Linda S. Klibanow, Pasadena, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Michael Rubin, Daniel T. Purtell, Victor M. Ortiz-de Montellano, Altshuler, Berzon, Nussbaum, Rubin & Demain, San Francisco, California; Della Bahan, Bahan & Herold, Pasadena, California, for defendant-appellee UNITE. Laurence S. Zakson, Carlos R. Perez, Reich, Adell, Crost & Cvitan, Los Angeles, California,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.