Dahl v. Rosenfeld

316 F.3d 1074 Randall C. DAHL; Ron Jorgensen; Kenneth Wierzbicki; Neville Hill; Erik Thomas; Eric R. Metzler; John Norton; Darrel Schexnider; and John R. Schley, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. David A. ROSENFELD, Esq., Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, a Professional Corporation, and Does 1-10, Defendants-Appellants. No. 01-16919. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 8, 2002. Filed January 23, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED David A. Rosenfeld, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Oakland, CA, pro se, for the defendants-appellants. Patrick J. Waltz, Waltz Law Firm, Sacramento, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Garland E. Burrell, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-01-00743-GEB. Before HAWKINS, GRABER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. OPINION TALLMAN, Circuit Judge. 1 Appellees Randall Dahl and his co-workers ("Dahl") filed a complaint in California Superior Court alleging that Appellants David Rosenfeld and his law firm ("law firm") committed legal malpractice by not adequately enforcing a provision of a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA").…