Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 1265·317 F.3d 1097·54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1032·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 970·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1678
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 200301-55834California6,545 words

Opinion

Opinion

317 F.3d 1097 Todd D. VESS, a minor; Deborah Vess, his Guardian ad Litem, Individually, on behalf of those similarly situated, and on behalf of the General Public of the State of California, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CIBA-GEIGY CORP. USA; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (CHADD); American Psychiatric Association, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-55834. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 2002. Filed January 31, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Donald F. Hildre and Peggy Reali, Dougherty, Hildre, Dudek & Haklar, San Diego, CA; John P. Coale and Julia McInerny, Coale, Cooley, Lietz & McInerny, Washington, DC; Richard F. Scruggs, Sidney A. Backstrom and Robin Reid Boswell, Scruggs Legas, Pascagoula, MS; Marc C. Saperstein and Kevin Decie, Davis, Saperstein & Solomon, Teaneck, NJ; C. Andrews Waters, Waters & Kraus, Dallas, TX, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Roxanne M. Wilson, Arter & Hadden LLP, Los Angeles, CA; James A. O'Neal, Bruce Jones, Joseph M. Price, and Bridget M. Ahmann, Faegre & Benson LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.