Lawson v. Washington

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 1523·319 F.3d 498·83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,306·90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1836·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1184
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 200300-35458California3,203 words

Opinion

Opinion

319 F.3d 498 Gregory LAWSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of WASHINGTON, The Washington State Patrol; Annette M. Sandberg, in her official and individual capacity; Lowell M. Porter, in his official and individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-35458. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Filed February 7, 2003. Before: REAVLEY, * B. FLETCHER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The Order filed on January 3, 2003, denying the petition for rehearing en banc, is hereby amended to include Judge Berzon's attached dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc. This order and Judge Berzon's dissent shall be published. 2 Judge Tallman has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Reavley has so recommended. Judge B. Fletcher has recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc. 3 The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35. 4 The petition for rehearing en banc is therefore denied. 5 The mandate shall issue in due course. 6…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.