Mukhtar v. California State University, Hayward

Bad Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 1679·319 F.3d 1073·83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,323·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1303·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2476
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 200301-15565California3,024 words

Opinion

Opinion

319 F.3d 1073 Mohamed Osman Elsayed MUKHTAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD, a public entity, Carlos Navarro and Norma Rees, employees of the California State University in their Official and Individual Capacities, Defendants-Appellants. No. 01-15565. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 2002. Filed August 7, 2002. Amended February 12, 2003. Fania E. Davis, Oakland, CA, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellee and filed a brief; Darryl Parker, Seattle, WA, was on the brief. Felicia R. Reid, Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, San Francisco, CA, argued the cause for the defendants-appellants and filed a brief. Oren M. Sellstom, Susan K. Serrano, Khari J. Tillery, San Francisco, CA, for amicus curiae Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, filed a brief in support of the plaintiff-appellee's petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Michael E. Tigar, Washington D.C., for amici curiae Michael E. Tigar and Charles J. Ogletree, Jr., filed a brief in support of the plaintiff-appellee's petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Appeal from the United States District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.