Ting v. At&t

319 F.3d 1126 Darcy TING, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Consumer Action, a non profit membership organization, both as private attorneys general, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AT&T, a New York corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-15416. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 7, 2002. Filed February 11, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED David W. Carpenter, Chicago, IL, for the defendant-appellant. F. Paul Bland, Jr., Washington, DC, James C. Sturdevant, Karen L. Hindin, The Sturdevant Law Firm P.C., San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs-appellees. Michelle R. Van Glederen, Deputy Attorney General (California), Los Angeles, CA, for amicus curiae Attorney General of the State of California; V. Scott Bailey, Assistant Attorney General (Maryland), Baltimore, MD, for amici curiae States and Commonwealths of Maryland, Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah,…