Nordyke v. King

Good Law
319 F.3d 1185
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 200399-17551California7,245 words

Opinion

Opinion

319 F.3d 1185 Russell Allen NORDYKE; Ann Sallie Nordyke, dba TS Trade Shows; Jess B. Guy; Duane Darr; William J. Jones; Daryl David; Tasiana Wertyschyn; Jean Lee; Todd Baltes; Dennis Blair; R.A. Adams; Roger Baker; Mike Fournier; Virgil McVicker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mary V. KING; Gail Steele; Wilma Chan; Keith Carson; Scott Haggerty, County of Alameda; The County of Alameda Board of Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-17551. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted August 10, 2000. Submission Vacated, Certified to California Supreme Court September 12, 2000. Certified Question Decided by California Supreme Court June 26, 2002. Supplemental Briefing Ordered September 6, 2002. Resubmitted February 11, 2003. Filed February 18, 2003. Donald E.J. Kilmer, Jr., Law Offices of Donald Kilmer, San Jose, CA, argued the cause and filed briefs for the appellants. Sayre Weaver, Richards, Watson, & Gershon, San Francisco, CA, argued the cause for the appellees; Richard Winnie, County Counsel, County of Alameda, was on the briefs. C.D. Michel, Trutanich Michel, LLP, San Pedro, CA, and Stephen P. Halbrook, Law Offices of Stephen P. Halbrook, Fairfax, VA,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.