United States v. Keith Shwayder, Michael G. Swan, and Kevin Orton

Good Law

2003 Daily Journal DAR 1978·320 F.3d 889·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3322

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 200301-10156, 01-10176 and 01-10186California141 words

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion of this court in the above-captioned case issued December 5, 2002 ( 312 F.3d 1109 ), is amended as follows:

Slip Op. page 19, lines 11-23 [ 312 F.3d at 1109-20 ], change:

With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellant’s petition for rehearing. Judge Berzon has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Hug and Lasnik recommend denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is denied and the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Appellant’s motion for leave to file a reply in support of the petition for rehearing is denied as moot.